Moscow, Yaroslavl, Russian Federation
The development of integration projects in the post-Soviet space (PSS) at the present stage is facing ever new challenges in the context of competition among global and regional centers of economic attraction represented by the USA, the European Union, China and Turkey, which actualizes the study of the prospects for integration projects of the newly independent states (NIS). The purpose of this study is to clarify the contours of the further development of regional cooperation through a generalization and comparative analysis of theoretical approaches to the integration of PSP with the identification of a possible optimal model of cooperation in the NIS. To achieve this goal, the work is divided into two blocks, which are determined by the objectives of the study. The first part of the work is focused on conducting a retrospective analysis of PSP regional cooperation in the context of the theories and approaches to regional integration used. The second part of the study is devoted to a comparative analysis of the approaches used to regional cooperation in the NIS in order to identify promising models of regional cooperation in the context of external sanctions pressure. The study summarizes some patterns in the context of PSP integration and analyzes the stages of development of post-Soviet integration in the context of the Russian concept of turning to the east. A distinction is made between fragmentation and regionalization of the post-Soviet space. It is concluded that although the European experience continues to be used in the design of post-Soviet integration, its applicability is significantly limited by the factor of sovereignty, strong differentiation of participants by level of economic development, and the desire of the participating countries to pursue a multi-vector policy. In modern conditions of fragmentation and regionalization of the post-Soviet space, the search for our own model of regional cooperation that would meet the new requirements of post-Soviet integration and adaptation of the Russian economy to external challenges is becoming increasingly relevant.
integration, EAEU, CIS, EU, national interests, sovereignty, zone of neighboring states (neighborhood zone).
1. Golovin M. Yu., Lobanov M. M. Investicionnoe vzaimodeystvie Rossii so stanami «Poyasa sosedstva» // Rossiyskiy vneshneekonomicheskiy vestnik. 2012. №1. S.17-31.
2. Kondrat'eva N.B. Evropeyskaya model' integracii rynkov stanovlenie i perspektiva: monografiya / Nataliya Borisovna Kondrat'eva; Rossiyskaya akademiya nauk, Federal'noe gosudarstvennoe byudzhetnoe uchrezhdenie nauki Institut Evropy Rossiyskoy akademii nauk. M.: RAN, 2020. 384 s.
3. Ishukov A.A., Bedrina E.B. Evropeyskaya i Evraziyskaya integracii: shodstva i razlichiya // Vestnik Baltiyskogo federal'nogo universiteta im. I. Kanta. Ser.: Gumanitranye i obschestvennye nauki.2020. №4. S.80-95.
4. Akopyan A.S. Formirovanie institutov integracii postsovetskih stran // Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 3: Ekonomika. Ekologiya. 2008. № 1 (12). S. 39-43.
5. Ilyuhina I.B. Problemy ekonomicheskoy integracii v evropeyskom Soyuze // Izvestiya Tul'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ekonomicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki. 2015. S. 113-123.
6. Grinberg R.S. SNG – sostoyanie i perspektivy [elektronnyy resurs]. Rezhim dostupa: https://cis.minsk.by/page/show?id=688 (data obrascheniya 01.06.2023)
7. Malamud A. 2001. Spillover in European and South American Integration: An Assessment.
8. Buelvas E.P. Why regionalism has failed in Latin Amercia: Lack of Stateness as an important factor for failure of Sovereignty Transfer in Integration Projects // Contexto int. 2013. № 35 (2) https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-85292013000200005
9. Velástegui P.G. Latin American integration as a wicked problem: the case for a plural approach // Revista de Relaciones Internacionales, Estrategia y Seguridad. 2018. № 1. pp. 93-117.
10. Ahmedzhanova D.F. Problemy razvitiya regional'noy integracii na prostranstve SNG // Postsovetskie issledovaniya. T. 5. №1.2022. S. 90-108.
11. Vardomskiy L.B. Postsovetskiy integracionnyy proekt: chto hoteli i chto poluchili// Mir peremen. 2016. № 3. S. 8-23.
12. Ziyadullaev N.S. Ekonomika stran Sodruzhestva: retrospektiva, strategii i imperativy / pod red. chl.-korr. RAN V.A. Cvetkova. M.: IPR RAN, 2022. 240 s.
13. Ocherki istorii Ministerstva inostrannyh del Rossii. T. II. 1917 – 2002. M.: OLMA-Media, 2002. 617 s.
14. Soglashenie o formirovanii EEP (Yalta, 19 sentyabrya 2003 g.) [SPS Garant] (data obrascheniya 01.06.2023).
15. Troiciy V.A. Pravovye osnovy assimetrichnoy integracii v ramkah soglasheniy o edinom ekonomicheskom prostranstve // Problemy sovremennoy ekonomiki. 2005. № 1.
16. Dadabaeva Z.A., Kuz'mina E.M. Processy regionalizacii v Central'noy Azii: problemy i protivorechiya: Nauchnyy doklad. M.: Institut ekonomiki RAN, 2014. 55
17. Ryzhova N. P. Rol' institutov v mezhdunarodnoy ekonomicheskoy integracii // Prostranstvennaya ekonomika. 2013. №1. S. 72–88.
18. Vladimir I. GUAM: starye problemy i novye vyzovy // Central'naya Aziya i Kavkaz. 2009. № 4-5 (64-65).
19. Emanuel A and Barnett M. 1998. Security Communities. - Cambridge: Cambridge University Press pp. 3 – 28.
20. Blikbaev K.N., Dyatlova M.I. Obschiy rynok lekarstvennyh sredstv EAES: analiz tekuschego sostoyaniya i problem razvitiya. 2022. №3. S.47-52.
21. Kaspiyskiy region v processah regionalizacii Evrazii: Kollektivnyy nauchnyy doklad / Otv. red. L.B. Var domskiy. – M.: Institut ekonomiki RAN, 2023. – 74 c.
22. Ziyadullaev N.S., Ziyadullaev U.S. Vneshnetorgovye i integracionnye prioritety Respubliki Uzbekistan // Rossiyskiy vneshneekonomicheskiy vestnik. 2020. № 6. S.63-82.
23. Rossiyskiy «Poyas sosedstva» v usloviyah sankcionnoy voyny: Nauchnyy doklad / Pod red. L.B. Vardomskogo (otv. red.), I.A. Korgun, N.V. Kulikovoy, A.G. Pylina. – M.: Institut ekonomiki RAN, 2022. – 118 c.
24. Heyfec B.A. Tri videniya stran–uchastnic Evraziyskogo ekonomicheskogo soyuza // Ekonomicheskoe vzaimodeystvie stran–chlenov SNG v kontekste Evraziyskogo integracionnogo proekta: Sbornik nauchnyh statey / Otv. red. L.B. Vardomskiy, A.G. Pylin. M.: IE RAN, 2015. S. 33–44.
