Russian Federation
Antananarivo, Madagascar
JEL Q56 Environment and Development • Environment and Trade • Sustainability • Environmental Accounts and Accounting • Environmental Equity • Population Growth
JEL Q57 Ecological Economics: Ecosystem Services • Biodiversity Conservation • Bioeconomics • Industrial Ecology
The study of sustainable decoupling as a target for modern environmental regulation stems from the global community’s renewed focus on climate change control and the reduction of air pollutant emissions in the late 20th and early 21st centuries. Researchers are particularly interested in the interaction between sustainable decoupling and industrial decarbonization, which forms the core of modern global environmental policy. The purpose of this study is to uncover the essence of sustainable decoupling as a tripartite process that integrates welfare decoupling, environmental decoupling, and natural resource use into a single concept for a triple recovery of global economic growth. The research focuses on decoupling and decarbonization processes occurring in the global economy in the context of the need to achieve international consensus on the environmental regulation agenda; the research objective is to develop a theoretical model for the relationship between sustainable decoupling and environmental regulation tools and mechanisms. Based on the analysis conducted in this article, the findings demonstrate a profound relationship between sustainable decoupling and decarbonization, and five strategic levers for decarbonization are identified. These findings can be used in the development of environmental policy and environmental decision-making by national and international institutions. Further research is needed to explore the problems and contradictions between individual national actors in contemporary international environmental regulation; systematize and identify national interests and the most significant factors influencing the environmental policies of developing and lower-income countries; and propose the most effective tools for achieving decoupling and decarbonization for these groups of countries.
environmental regulation, decarbonization, sustainable decoupling, triple global crisis, greenhouse gas emissions, renewable energy, fossil fuels, Brundtland Commission, Kyoto Protocol, Paris Agreement
1. Doklad Vsemirnoy komissii po voprosam okruzhayuschey sredy i razvitiya «Nashe obschee buduschee» (1987) / Preds. Komissii G.H. Bruntland. Dok. № A/42/427. URL: https://www.un.org/ru/ga/pdf/brundtland.pdf (data obrascheniya: 17.03.2026).
2. Imamverdieva M.I., Hadasevich N.R., Kaufman N.Yu. (2023). Ekonomicheskoe soderzhanie effekta dekaplinga kak klyuchevogo elementa ustoychivogo razvitiya kompaniy // Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. № 11 (481). S. 9-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47475/1994-2796-2023-481-11-9-20; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/VZEFMO
3. Kiotskiy protokol k Ramochnoy konvencii Organizacii Ob'edinennyh Naciy ob izmenenii klimata (1997). Prinyat 11 dekabrya 1997 goda. URL: https://www.un.org/ru/documents/decl_conv/conventions/kyoto.shtml (data obrascheniya: 17.03.2026).
4. Kurpas P.A. (2024). Transgranichnye effekty ekologicheskoy politiki Evropeyskogo soyuza: do i posle «zelenoy sdelki» // Teoreticheskaya ekonomika. № 11. S 111-123. DOI:https://doi.org/10.52957/2221-3260-2024-11-111-123 EDN: https://elibrary.ru/UOZCMH
5. Medouz D.H., Medouz D.L., Renders Y., Berens V.V. (1991). Predely rosta: Doklad po proektu Rimskogo kluba «Slozhnoe polozhenie chelovechestva». M.: izd-vo MGU.
6. Patrunina K.A. (2022). Global'noe ekonomicheskoe neravenstvo: tendencii i faktory razvitiya // Ekonomika i upravlenie: problemy, resheniya. T. 1. № 2 (122). S. 85-92. DOI:https://doi.org/10.36871/ek.up.p.r.2022.02.01.011. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/GZIGLA
7. Piskulova N.A. Zelenaya ekonomika (2015) / Ustoychivoe razvitie: novye vyzovy. Moskva: Izdatel'stvo «Aspekt-Press». S. 76–83.
8. Polyakov V.V. (2024). Koncepciya dekaplinga: celevoy orientir ili illyuziya? // Ekonomika i ekologiya territorial'nyh obrazovaniy. T. 8. № 2. S. 8-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23947/2413-1474-2024-8-2-8-14; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/TACHZZ
9. Rio-de-Zhaneyrskaya deklaraciya po okruzhayuschey srede i razvitiyu (1992). Prinyata Konferenciey OON po okruzhayuschey srede i razvitiyu, Rio-de-Zhaneyro, 3–14 iyunya 1992 goda. URL: https://www.un.org/ru/documents/decl_conv/declarations/riodecl.shtml data obrascheniya: 17.03.2026).
10. Celi razvitiya tysyacheletiya: doklad za 2015 god (2015). N'yu-York: Organizaciya Ob'edinennyh Naciy. URL: https://www.un.org/ru/millenniumgoals/mdgreport2015.pdf (data obrascheniya: 17.03.2026).
11. Almeida N. (2017). Environnement et climat dans les BRICS : un moment cosmopolitique // Hermès, La Revue. № 3 (79). C. 173–179. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.3917/herm.079.0173.
12. Bend the trend: pathways to a liveable planet as resource use spikes (2024) // International Resource Panel. Kenya: Nairobi: UNEP.
13. Descamps P. (1972). L’avertissement du Club de Rome // Le Monde diplomatique. URL: https://www.monde-diplomatique.fr/mav/167/DESCAMPS/60401 (data obrascheniya: 17.03.2026).
14. Duval A. (2024). Décarbonation. URL: https://hal.science/hal-04713919v1/ (data obrascheniya: 17.03.2026).
15. ILO (1996). Globalization Changes the Face of Textile, Clothing and Footwear Industries. ILO/96/33 | URL: https://www.ilo.org/fr/resource/news/la-mondialisation-des-industries-du-textile-de-lhabillement-et-de-la (data obrascheniya: 17.03.2026).
16. IPCC (2022). Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change / ed. by P.R. Shukla [et al.]. Cambridge, UK ; New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press. URL: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157926 (data obrascheniya: 17.03.2026).
17. Kuznets S. (1955). Economic Growth and Income Inequality // The American Economic Review. Vol. XLV. No 1. Pp. 1-28.
18. L’Amendement de Doha ratifié, un engagement multilatéral fort (2020). CCNUCC. URL: https://unfccc.int/fr/news/l-amendement-de-doha-ratifie-un-engagement-multilateral-fort (data obrascheniya: 17.03.2026).
19. Januel C. (2022). Brève histoire de l’émergence de la question environnementale dans le droit | Millénaire 3. URL: https://millenaire3.grandlyon.com/ressources/2022/breve-histoire-de-l-emergence-de-la-question-environnementale-dans-le-droit (data obrascheniya: 17.03.2026).
20. Maljean-Dubois S. (2003). La mise en œuvre du droit international de l’environnement // GOUVERNANCE MONDIALE. №3. URL: https://www.iddri.org/sites/default/files/import/publications/an_0303_maljeandubois_die.pdf (data obrascheniya: 17.03.2026).
21. Mousel M., Hours A., Lapierre C. L. (2013). Économie Verte, histoire et définitions //’Encyclopédie du Développement Durable. № 185.
22. Protocole de Kyoto : enjeux et bilan // Geo.fr [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: https://www.geo.fr/environnement/protocole-de-kyoto-enjeux-et-bilan-193595 (data obrascheniya: 17.06.2025).
23. Ramos C., Mossé J. Découplage et croissance verte* | Carbone 4. URL: https://www.carbone4.com/files/267_publication_decouplage.pdf (data obrascheniya: 17.03.2026).
24. Sachs I. (1978). Ecodéveloppement : une approche de planification // Économie rurale Année. № 124. Pp. 16-22. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.3406/ecoru.1978.2551.
25. Salin M. (2020). La «courbe de Kuznets environnementale» et le «découplag»: deux concepts du débat sur la croissance verte // Regards croisés sur l’économie. № 1 (26). C. 145–152. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.3917/rce.026.0145. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/SJBKVO
26. Vaillancourt J. (1998). Évolution conceptuelle et historique du développement durable. Quebec: L’Atelier d’aménagement, d’urbanisme et d’environnement. URL: https://www.rncreq.org/images/UserFiles/files/Rapport_de_recherche_evolution_DD.pdf (data obrascheniya: 17.03.2026).
