Ярославль, Россия
Ярославль, Ярославская область, Россия
Анализ литературных источников показывает, что вопросам изменения состояния окружающей среды в результате воздействия многочисленных экономических факторов, уделяется большое внимание. В данном обзоре литературы из множества экономических факторов, оказывающих влияние на экологию выделены четыре: динамика протекания интеграционных процессов; темпы экономического роста; динамика финансового развития; качество жизни населения. Цель исследования – оценка влияния ряда экономических факторов на состояние окружающей среды на основе анализа литературных источников. Гипотеза исследования: интеграционные процессы ведут к интенсификации финансовых потоков между странами, что способствует увеличению темпов роста экономик, а это оказывает влияние на состояние окружающей среды через изменение выбросов CO2 и качества жизни населения. В обзоре литературы проанализировано 40 источников. Установлено, что региональная интеграция преимущественно способствует снижению загрязнений за счёт инноваций и сотрудничества; экономический рост увеличивает загрязнение на начальных стадиях развития, но может способствовать снижению экологического ущерба в долгосрочной перспективе в соответствии с гипотезой экологической кривой Кузнеца; финансовое развитие оказывает разнонаправленное воздействие на экологию; повышение качества жизни населения ведет к росту консьюмеризма, что увеличивает нагрузку на окружающую среду. Проведенное исследование может послужить отправной точкой для формулирования собственных исследовательских гипотез, связанных с оценкой влияния экономических факторов, влияющих на состояние окружающей среды.
экология; состояние окружающей среды; экономический рост; интеграция; финансовое развитие; качество жизни
1. Ahmad M. [и др.]. The dynamic impact of natural resources, technological innovations and economic growth on ecological footprint: An advanced panel data estimation // Resources Policy. 2020. (69). C. 101817.
2. Anwar A. [и др.]. The nexus between urbanization, renewable energy consumption, financial development, and CO2 emissions: evidence from selected Asian countries // Environment, Development and Sustainability. 2022. № 5 (24). C. 6556–6576.
3. Batool Z. [и др.]. ICT, renewable energy, financial development, and CO2 emissions in developing countries of East and South Asia // Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2022. № 23 (29). C. 35025–35035.
4. Bayar Y., Diaconu (Maxim) L., Maxim A. Financial Development and CO2 Emissions in Post-Transition European Union Countries // Sustainability. 2020. № 7 (12). C. 2640.
5. Bhar S. [и др.]. Water, air pollution and carbon footprints of conspicuous/luxury consumption in India // Ecological Economics. 2024. (218). C. 108104.
6. Çakmak E. E., Acar S. The nexus between economic growth, renewable energy and ecological footprint: An empirical evidence from most oil-producing countries // Journal of Cleaner Production. 2022. (352). C. 131548.
7. Danish [и др.]. Linking economic growth and ecological footprint through human capital and biocapacity // Sustainable Cities and Society. 2019. (47). C. 101516.
8. Das A., Brown L., McFarlane A. Asymmetric Effects of Financial Development on CO2 Emissions in Bangladesh // Journal of Risk and Financial Management. 2023. № 5 (16). C. 269.
9. Hametner M. Economics without ecology: How the SDGs fail to align socioeconomic development with environmental sustainability // Ecological Economics. 2022. (199). C. 107490.
10. He P. [и др.]. Environmental impacts of dietary quality improvement in China // Journal of Environmental Management. 2019. (240). C. 518–526.
11. He W. [и др.]. Will regional economic integration influence carbon dioxide marginal abatement costs? Evidence from Chinese panel data // Energy Economics. 2018. (74). C. 263–274.
12. Javeed S., Siddique H. M. A., Javed F. Ecological footprint, globalization, and economic growth: evidence from Asia // Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2023. № 31 (30). C. 77006–77021.
13. Kumari N., Kumar P., Sahu N. C. Do energy consumption and environmental quality enhance subjective wellbeing in G20 countries? // Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2021. № 42 (28). C. 60246–60267.
14. Kuznets S. Economic Growth and Income Inequality // The American Economic Review. 1955. № 1 (45). C. 1–28.
15. Li J., Lin B. Does energy and CO2 emissions performance of China benefit from regional integration? // Energy Policy. 2017. (101). C. 366–378.
16. Lv X., Zhu Y., Du J. Can Regional Integration Policies Enhance the Win–Win Situation of Economic Growth and Environmental Protection? New Evidence for Achieving Carbon Neutrality Goals // Sustainability. 2024. № 4 (16). C. 1647.
17. Lv Z., Li S. How financial development affects CO2 emissions: A spatial econometric analysis // Journal of Environmental Management. 2021. (277). C. 111397.
18. Maji I. K., Habibullah M. S., Saari M. Y. Financial development and sectoral CO2 emissions in Malaysia // Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2017. № 8 (24). C. 7160–7176.
19. Meena R. K. The impact of technological innovation for clean and green products on the environment // RESEARCH HUB International Multidisciplinary Research Journal. 2024. № 4 (11). C. 45–53.
20. Murshed M. [и др.]. The effects of regional trade integration and renewable energy transition on environmental quality: Evidence from South Asian neighbors // Business Strategy and the Environment. 2021. № 8 (30). C. 4154–4170.
21. Orecchia C., Zoppoli P. Consumerism and Environment: Does Consumption Behaviour Affect Environmental Quality? // 2007.
22. Qi Z., Liu F., Ding T. The pollution control effect of regional integration: An empirical study based on Urban Agglomeration Planning in China // Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2023. № 40 (30). C. 93126–93141.
23. Saleem S. B., Ali Y. Effect of lifestyle changes and consumption patterns on environmental impact: a comparison study of Pakistan and China // Chinese Journal of Population Resources and Environment. 2019. № 2 (17). C. 113–122.
24. Sen S., Singh M. K., Das A. Effects of Food Production and Consumption on Environment and Climate под ред. M. Mukherjee [и др.]., Singapore: Springer, 2021.C. 361–370.
25. Shah M. I. [и др.]. The roles of energy, natural resources, agriculture and regional integration on CO2 emissions in selected countries of ASEAN: does political constraint matter? // Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2023. № 10 (30). C. 26063–26077.
26. Shahbaz M. [и др.]. Economic growth, energy consumption, financial development, international trade and CO2 emissions in Indonesia // Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2013. (25). C. 109–121.
27. Shahbaz M. [и др.]. Does financial development reduce CO2 emissions in Malaysian economy? A time series analysis // Economic Modelling. 2013. (35). C. 145–152.
28. Shahbaz M. [и др.]. The effect of financial development and economic growth on ecological footprint: evidence from top 10 emitter countries // Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2023. № 29 (30). C. 73518–73533.
29. Sharma R., Nguyen T. T., Grote U. Changing Consumption Patterns—Drivers and the Environmental Impact // Sustainability. 2018. № 11 (10). C. 4190.
30. Szymczyk K. [и др.]. The Effect of Energy Usage, Economic Growth, and Financial Development on CO2 Emission Management: An Analysis of OECD Countries with a High Environmental Performance Index // Energies. 2021. № 15 (14). C. 4671.
31. Tinoco-Zermeño M. Á. Energy consumption, financial development, CO2 emissions, and economic growth in 23 developing economies // Revista Mexicana de Economía y Finanzas Nueva Época REMEF. 2023. № 1 (18). C. 775.
32. Usman M., Makhdum M. S. A., Kousar R. Does financial inclusion, renewable and non-renewable energy utilization accelerate ecological footprints and economic growth? Fresh evidence from 15 highest emitting countries // Sustainable Cities and Society. 2021. (65). C. 102590.
33. Usman O., Alola A. A., Sarkodie S. A. Assessment of the role of renewable energy consumption and trade policy on environmental degradation using innovation accounting: Evidence from the US // Renewable Energy. 2020. (150). C. 266–277.
34. Wang X., Yan L., Zhao X. Tackling the ecological footprint in china through energy consumption, economic growth and CO2 emission: an ARDL approach // Quality & Quantity. 2022. № 2 (56). C. 511–531.
35. Xiao R. [и др.]. Pathways to sustainable development: Regional integration and carbon emissions in China // Energy Reports. 2022. (8). C. 5137–5145.
36. Xiong F. [и др.]. The influencing mechanism of financial development on CO2 emissions in China: double moderating effect of technological innovation and fossil energy dependence // Environment, Development and Sustainability. 2023. № 6 (25). C. 4911–4933.
37. Xiong F., Zhang R., Mo H. The mediating effect of financial development on CO2 emissions: An empirical study based on provincial panel data in China // Science of The Total Environment. 2023. (896). C. 165220.
38. Xu X., Huang S., An H. Identification and causal analysis of the influence channels of financial development on CO2 emissions // Energy Policy. 2021. (153). C. 112277.
39. Xu Z. [и др.]. Nexus between financial development and CO2 emissions in Saudi Arabia: analyzing the role of globalization // Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2018. № 28 (25). C. 28378–28390.
40. Zhao B., Yang W. Does financial development influence CO2 emissions? A Chinese province-level study // Energy. 2020. (200). C. 117523.
41. Not All About Consumption | Science [Электронный ресурс]. URL: https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.1234205 (дата обращения: 08.12.2024).
