employee
Moscow, Russian Federation
Moscow, Moscow, Russian Federation
JEL E23 Production
JEL E61 Policy Objectives • Policy Designs and Consistency • Policy Coordination
JEL O14 Industrialization • Manufacturing and Service Industries • Choice of Technology
JEL O22 Project Analysis
VAK Russia 5.2.1
VAK Russia 5.2.5
UDC 33
In the context of global technological transformation and geoeconomic instability, neo-industrialization is a key tool for ensuring industrial competitiveness and economic security. In the 1990s, deindustrialization trends intensified, leading to a weakening of the manufacturing industry and increased dependence on raw materials exports. The country entered the era of post-industrial transformations without a sufficient industrial core. Neo-industrialization is a response to this trend, implying the reconstruction of industry on a new technological base, rather than simply a return to the past. External shocks and sanctions have exacerbated the problem of technological dependence. Reduced access to foreign technology and investment has led to the need for accelerated import substitution and a search for domestic sources of development. This article describes the methodology for studying state neo-industrialization policy, which involves the development of a set of measures and strategies aimed at modernizing the economy through the introduction of advanced technologies, the development of high-tech industries, and increased labor productivity. Neo-industrialization policy is focused on the transition from a raw materials-based and traditional industrial model to an innovative one based on knowledge and new technologies. To study this process, the authors selected a systems methodology that allows for the formalization of modernization processes by integrating technological, institutional, and socio-economic components. The novelty of the study is the justification for the choice of a systems approach for studying the systemic development of state neo-industrialization policy, as well as the adaptation of a notebook version of a modern systems approach. The authors particularly highlight the design component of the systems approach in the formation and implementation of state neo-industrialization policy. The aim of the study is to develop the conceptual aspects of a systems methodology for neo-industrialization, identify key components, design methods, and mechanisms for policy implementation. The objectives of the study include a description of the principles of the neo-industrialization research methodology; identification of structural components; proposal of a step-by-step methodology for designing neo-industrialization policy; evaluation of neo-industrialization process management tools; and formation of practical recommendations.
state neo-industrialization policy, methodology, systems approach, modernization, innovation, knowledge, technology.
1. Bodrunov, S. D. (2023). Promyshlennaya politika Rossii v usloviyah vyzovov global'noy transformacii: zadachi teorii i praktiki perehoda k novomu etapu industrial'nogo razvitiya (NIO.2) / S. D. Bodrunov // Ekonomicheskoe vozrozhdenie Rossii. № 2(76). S. 5-12. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.37930/1990-9780-2023-2(76)-5-12. – EDN WPDXVR.
2. Buzgalin, A. V. (2023). Rossiyskaya ekonomicheskaya sistema: protivorechiya i potencial razvitiya / A. V. Buzgalin // Voprosy politicheskoy ekonomii. № 3. S. 59-68. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8319984. – EDN SEHKMQ.
3. Brizhak, O. V. (2018). Konformirovanie korporativnogo kapitala v usloviyah sistemnyh social'no-ekonomicheskih preobrazovaniy / O. V. Brizhak. Krasnodar : Kubanskiy gosudarstvennyy tehnologicheskiy universitet, 254 s. – EDN YYYPAT.
4. Buzgalin, A. V. (2003). Teoriya social'no-ekonomicheskih transformaciy : Proshloe, nastoyaschee i buduschee ekonomik «real. socializma» v global. postindustr. mire : Ucheb. dlya studentov ekon. special'nostey / A. V. Buzgalin, A. I. Kolganov ; A. V. Buzgalin, A. I. Kolganov; Mosk. gos. un-t im. M. V. Lomonosova. Ekon. fak. Kaf. polit. ekonomii. Moskva : TEIS, 680 s. ISBN 5-7218-0300-2. – EDN QQCIJN.
5. Buzgalin, A. V. (2022). Tvorcheskiy chelovek v ekonomike buduschego / A. V. Buzgalin // Ekonomicheskoe vozrozhdenie Rossii. № 1(71). S. 48-57. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.37930/1990-9780-2022-1-71-48-57.
6. Brizhak, O. V. (2021). Politika neoindustrializacii v kontekste novoy ekonomicheskoy real'nosti / O. V. Brizhak, O. N. Tolstobokov // Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. № 10(456). S. 9-17. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.47475/1994-2796-2021-11001. – EDN GYBTHN.
7. Brizhak, O. V. (2016). Sovremennye problemy rossiyskih korporaciy: neobhodimost' sistemnogo podhoda / O. V. Brizhak // Ekonomicheskaya nauka sovremennoy Rossii. № 1(72). S. 19-28. – EDN TQGZCM.
8. Glaz'ev, S. Yu. (2025). Klyuchevym napravleniem ekonomicheskoy politiki na blizhayshuyu perspektivu dolzhno stat' osuschestvlenie promyshlennogo proryva na osnove novogo tehnologicheskogo uklada / S. Yu. Glaz'ev // Vestnik FIPS. T. 4, № 2(12). S. 108-111. – EDN PWHWJL.
9. Gordeev V.A., Gordeev A.A. (2014). Industrializaciya v SSSR: aktual'nye i neaktual'nye dlya RF aspekty: Monografiya / V.A. Gordeev, A.A. Gordeev. Yaroslavl': Izd-vo YaGTU, 231s.
10. Gordeev, V. A. (2025). Teoreticheskaya ekonomiya: k novym ideyam po razvitiyu koncepcii / V. A. Gordeev // Teoreticheskaya ekonomika. № 5(125). S. 4-11. – EDN WESULV.
11. Gubanov, S. S. (2018). Neoindustrial'naya paradigma razvitiya: osnovy i znachenie / S. S. Gubanov // Novaya industrializaciya Rossii: strategicheskie prioritety strany i vozmozhnosti Urala. Ekaterinburg : Ural'skiy gosudarstvennyy ekonomicheskiy universitet, S. 27-61. – EDN XWHNBB.
12. Glaz'ev, S. Yu. (2025). Kakoy dolzhna byt' rol' institutov razvitiya v novom mirohozyaystvennom uklade / S. Yu. Glaz'ev // Evraziyskaya integraciya: ekonomika, pravo, politika. T. 19, № 1(51). S. 9-10. – EDN AXATRU.
13. Inshakov, O. V. (2013). Formirovanie kategorial'nogo apparata issledovaniya nanoindustrii / O. V. Inshakov, A. V. Fesyun // Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 7: Filosofiya. Sociologiya i social'nye tehnologii. № 1(19). S. 26-35. – EDN RBYABL.
14. Kleyner, G. B. (2017). Ot «ekonomiki fizicheskih lic» k sistemnoy ekonomike / G. B. Kleyner // Voprosy ekonomiki. № 8. S. 56-74. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2017-8-56-74. – EDN ZDJSQD.
15. Kleyner, G. B. (2024). A.A. Bogdanov i sovremennaya ekonomicheskaya teoriya: dvizhenie k sistematizacii / G. B. Kleyner // Nauchnye issledovaniya ekonomicheskogo fakul'teta. Elektronnyy zhurnal. T. 16, № 4(54). S. 148-157. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.38050/2078-3809-2024-16-4-148-157. – EDN RMVQEO.
16. Kornai, Ya. (2002). Sistemnaya paradigma. Voprosy ekonomiki. №5. S. 4-23.
17. Mamedov, O. Yu. (2016). «Troyanskiy kon'» direktivnosti / O. Yu. Mamedov // Terra Economicus. T. 14, № 2. S. 6-25. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.18522/2073-6606-2016-14-2-6-25. – EDN WFSMEN.
18. Marks, K. (1960). Kapital / K. Marks, F. Engel's. Soch., 2-e izd. T. 23. - M.: Gosudarstvennoe izdatel'stvo politicheskoy literatury, 907 s.
19. Naumova, E. I. (2025). Postkapitalizm i nevozmozhnost' socializma? K voprosu o novom klasse / E. I. Naumova // Diskurs-Pi. T. 22, № 4. S. 228-244. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.17506/18179568_2025_22_4_228. – EDN DBWBRD.
20. Ryazanov, V. T. (2017). Neoindustrializm i strategiya ekonomicheskogo razvitiya Rossii / V. T. Ryazanov // Mir peremen. № 1. S. 177-180. – EDN YHDBNL.
21. Ryazanov, V. T. (2019). Sovremennaya politicheskaya ekonomiya: perspektivy neomarksistskogo sinteza / V. T. Ryazanov. Sankt-Peterburg : Izdatel'stvo Aleteyya, 436 s. ISBN 978-5-907115-44-6. – EDN VOFQUI.
22. Suharev, O. S. (2001). Teoriya ekonomicheskoy disfunkcii : Monografiya / O.S. Suharev. Moskva : Mashinostroenie, 212 s. ISBN 5-94275-011-4. – EDN YQJWXP.
23. Tolstobokov, O. N. (2026). Investicionnoe obespechenie celey politiki neoindustrializacii rossiyskoy ekonomiki / O. N. Tolstobokov, R. K. Polyakov, O. V. Brizhak // Vestnik Samarskogo gosudarstvennogo ekonomicheskogo universiteta. № 2(256). S. 20-34. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.46554/1993-0453-2026-2-256-20-34. – EDN SXWEVE.
24. Tumanyan, Yu. R. (2022). Mehanizm soglasovaniya i realizacii ekonomicheskih interesov kak sposob dostizheniya makroekonomicheskogo ravnovesiya / Yu. R. Tumanyan // Ekonomika: vchera, segodnya, zavtra. T. 12, № 9-1. S. 59-65. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.34670/AR.2022.38.48.066. – EDN TOJWLH.
25. Frolov, D. P. (2012). Institucional'naya logika tehnologicheskogo progressa (sluchay nanotehnologiy) / D. P. Frolov // Zhurnal institucional'nyh issledovaniy. T. 4, № 1. S. 49-64. – EDN OXNBFD.
26. Brizhak, O. V. (2022). Forming the new industrial core of Russian industry: problems and perspectives / O. V. Brizhak, O. N. Tolstobokov // Research in Economic Anthropology. Vol. 42. – P. 155-160. – DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1108/S0190-128120220000042015. – EDN CSTGKH.
27. Kornai, J. (1998). The system paradigm. William Davidson Institute Working Papers Series. S. 278. URL: https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitst/wp278.pdf
28. Polyakov, R. (2023). Industrial Clusters and the Process of their Self- Organization / R. Polyakov, O. Brizhak // Ecosystems Without Borders 2023. Opportunities and Challenges : Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, Kaliningrad: Springer. P. 60-72. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-34329-2_7. – EDN BCHVPM.
