St. Petersburg, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation
The main purpose of the study is to identify the reasons for the increasing differentiation of regions in terms of socio-economic development as a threat to the economic security of the regions. The goal was achieved based on the consistent solution of three tasks, including the collection and processing of statistical information on the level of socio-economic development of the regions, the formation of a system of indicators of economic security and the development of recommendations to reduce the level of regional differentiation. The indicative approach of Glazyev S.Yu. is used as the basic model. The applied research methods are also based on the recommendations of well-known researchers such as V. Kristaller, who contributed to the development of the theory of central locations, on the basis of which it was suggested that the placement of activities in the field of economic formation and development of the region is mainly due to the conditions of supply and demand. Lesh A. is the author of the theory of economic space, based on the concept of the «cone of demand». Granberg A.G., founder of the Russian school of spatial interdisciplinary research, whose methodology has made a huge contribution to the development of territorial development projects. Senchagov V.K. laid the foundation for an approach to the formation of indicators that determine the stable socio-economic development of regions. All indicators of socio-economic indicators for assessing the subjects of the Russian Federation were divided into twenty subgroups: population; labor; standard of living; education; culture, recreation, tourism; land resources and environmental protection; gross regional product; fixed assets; investments; organizations; industrial production; agriculture; trade and services; transport; information and communication technologies; science and innovation; finance; prices and tariffs. To obtain an average assessment of the level of economic security by region, a statistical comparison was carried out by the size of the integral coefficient of economic indicators, by the integral social indicator and the integral indicator of economic security in general. The practical effectiveness of the study lies in the possibility of applying the results obtained to develop recommendations for reducing the level of differentiation between regions.
indicators of economic security, level of socio-economic development, efficiency, differentiation of regions
1. Arhipova, L. S. Vliyanie migracionnyh processov na ekonomicheskuyu bezopasnost' i prostranstvennoe razvitie Rossii / L. S. Arhipova, I. V. Gorohova // Vestnik Rossiyskogo ekonomicheskogo universiteta imeni G.V. Plehanova. – 2022. – T. 19, № 3(123). – S. 119-133.
2. Glaz'ev S.Yu. Osnova obespecheniya ekonomicheskoy bezopasnosti strany: al'ternativnyy reformacionnyy kurs // Rossiyskiy zhurnal. - 1997. - № 1. - S. 5–6.
3. Goncharenko, V. E. Ocenka neravnomernosti razvitiya regionov RF po social'no-ekonomicheskim resursnym sostavlyayuschim / V. E. Goncharenko, V. F. Korobova // Statistika i Ekonomika. – 2019. – T. 16, № 4. – S. 54-72.
4. Illarionov A.N. Kriterii ekonomicheskoy bezopasnosti // Voprosy ekonomiki. - 1998. - № 10. - S. 35–58.
5. Kovarda, V. V. Napravleniya razvitiya normativno-pravovoy bazy ocenki effektivnosti deyatel'nosti organov ispolnitel'noy vlasti regionov Rossii / V. V. Kovarda // Obschestvo: politika, ekonomika, pravo. – 2018. – № 8(61). – S. 49-52.
6. Kremlev, N. D. Ocenka adaptacii naseleniya regionov v usloviyah perehoda k dinamichnomu razvitiyu / N. D. Kremlev // Korporativnoe upravlenie i innovacionnoe razvitie ekonomiki Severa: Vestnik Nauchno-issledovatel'skogo centra korporativnogo prava, upravleniya i venchurnogo investirovaniya Syktyvkarskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. – 2021. – T. 1, № 2. – S. 190-200.
7. Krivencova, L. A. Garantiya polucheniya dohoda kak komponenta ekonomicheskoy bezopasnosti regiona / L. A. Krivencova // Regional'naya ekonomika i upravlenie: elektronnyy nauchnyy zhurnal. – 2021. – № 4(68).
8. Lozovaya, I. A. Diagnostika ekonomicheskoy bezopasnosti promyshlennogo sektora regiona / I. A. Lozovaya, E. Yu. Merkulova // Izvestiya Yugo-Zapadnogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Ekonomika. Sociologiya. Menedzhment. – 2024. – T. 14, № 1. – S. 63-75.
9. Matraeva, L. V. Monitoring processov vneshney migracii kak instrument regional'noy migracionnoy politiki / L. V. Matraeva // Intellekt. Innovacii. Investicii. – 2024. – № 4. – S. 11-25.
10. Moroz, N. A. Differenciaciya rossiyskogo ekonomicheskogo prostranstva kak faktor obespecheniya ekonomicheskoy bezopasnosti / N. A. Moroz, V. A. Plotnikov // Ekonomika i upravlenie. – 2018. – № 1(147). – S. 70-78.
11. Muharramova, E. R. Differenciaciya social'no-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya regionov Rossiyskoy Federacii i puti ee snizheniya / E. R. Muharramova, M. E. Vays // Ekonomika i predprinimatel'stvo. – 2025. – № 3(176). – S. 211-216.
12. Oficial'nyy sayt Federal'noy sluzhby gosudarstvennoy statistiki URL: https://rosstat.gov.ru/.
13. Porogovye znacheniya pokazateley ekonomicheskoy bezopasnosti CFO / V. A. Bonchenkova, A. A. Detkov, S. Yu. Guseva, P. S. Zhihalov // Karel'skiy nauchnyy zhurnal. – 2018. – T. 7, № 4(25). – S. 66-58.
14. Problemy obespecheniya bezopasnogo razvitiya territorii / E. N. Bashirina, R. A. Gil'mutdinova, E. V. Dubinina [i dr.]. – Ufa : Ufimskiy universitet nauki i tehnologiy, 2022. – 96 s.
15. Rogova, T. N. Metodika ocenki urovnya finansovo-ekonomicheskoy bezopasnosti regiona / T. N. Rogova // Ekonomicheskiy analiz: teoriya i praktika. – 2021. – T. 20, № 6(513). – S. 1043-1065.
16. Salikov Yu. A., Zolotareva I.I., Borodkina T.A. Ugrozy ekonomicheskoy bezopasnosti regiona // Vestnik VGUIT. - 2017. - T.79. - № 1.
17. Samoylova L.K. Klassifikaciya ugroz social'no-ekonomicheskogo haraktera v celyah vyyavleniya urovnya ekonomicheskoy bezopasnosti regiona // Ekonomicheskie nauki. - 2013. - S. 181-184.
18. Optimizaciya indikatorov i porogovyh urovney v razvitii finansovo-bankovskih i cenovyh pokazateley v sisteme ekonomicheskoy bezopasnosti RF / V. K. Senchagov, M. Yu. Lev, M. I. Gel'vanovskiy [i dr.]. – Moskva : Izdatel'stvo «Maska», 2017. – 140 s.
19. Syupova, M. S. Reytingovaya ocenka ekonomicheskoy bezopasnosti municipal'nyh obrazovaniy regiona / M. S. Syupova // Vlast' i upravlenie na Vostoke Rossii. – 2021. – № 4(97). – S. 72-81.
20. Ukaz Prezidenta RF ot 13 maya 2017 g. № 208 «O Strategii ekonomicheskoy bezopasnosti Rossiyskoy Federacii na period do 2030 goda» // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF. -15.05.2017. № 20. st. 2902.
21. Fedoseeva, T. A. Problemy differenciacii territoriy / T. A. Fedoseeva // Razvitie i bezopasnost'. – 2023. – № 4(20). – S. 100-114.
22. Formirovanie effektivnoy sistemy ekonomicheskoy bezopasnosti regionov Rossii s uchastiem organov vnutrennih del: uchebnoe posobie [Yu. G. Naumov i dr.]. – M.: Akademiya upravleniya MVD Rossii - 2021 -188 s.
23. Fundamental'nye i prikladnye issledovaniya v oblasti ekonomiki i finansov : Sbornik nauchnyh statey IX mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferencii, Orel, 07 dekabrya 2023 goda. – Orel: Srednerusskiy institut upravleniya – filial RANHiGS, 2023. – 217 s.
24. Shelomenceva, M. V. Differenciaciya regionov rossiysko-belorusskogo prigranich'ya v kontekste ekonomicheskoy bezopasnosti / M. V. Shelomenceva // Tvorcheskoe nasledie A.S. Posnikova i sovremennost'. – 2016. – № 10. – S. 283-288.
25. Ekonomika razvitiya: vyzovy sovremennosti / I. V. Gersonskaya, A. V. Grafov, V. M. Erusalimskiy [i dr.] ; Rossiyskaya akademiya narodnogo hozyaystva i gosudarstvennoy sluzhby pri Prezidente RF. – Voronezh : Avtonomnaya nekommercheskaya organizaciya po okazaniyu izdatel'skih i poligraficheskih uslug «NAUKA-YuNIPRESS», 2021. – 156 s.
This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International



