Do modern theories of economics need a methodological culture of political and economic research?

Lyudmila Karaseva

doi:10.52957/2221-3260-2024-8-12-24

DO MODERN THEORIES OF ECONOMICS NEED A METHODOLOGICAL CULTURE OF POLITICAL AND ECONOMIC RESEARCH? Do modern theories of economics need a methodological culture of political and economic research?

АА Аа

Published in Theoretical economics · Issue 8 · Pages 12–24 · Rubric: ACTUAL PROBLEMS OF THEORETICAL ECONOMY

DOI: https://doi.org/10.52957/2221-3260-2024-8-12-24

Received: 10.08.2024 Accepted: 28.08.2024 Published: 30.08.2024

Authors

Lyudmila Karaseva

ORCID

Lyudmila Karaseva

Academic degree: doctor of economic sciences

Science rang: professor

FGBOU VPO «Tverskoy gosudarstvennyy universitet»

ORCID

ABSTRACT

In conditions when the main meaningful meaning of the choice of the Russian way forward is formed, the problem of the formation of economic theory, adequate to the modern stage of development of national and world economies, whose economic systems are in a state of deep transformation, is actualized more than ever. Economic science in the “new reality” is faced with such phenomena as the socialization of the economic life of modern society, the economization and financialization of politics and the politicization of the economy in the context of the globalization process, again highlighting the question of the place and directions of the development of political economy in economic science. Therefore, there is a serious question about the paradigm of modern economic theory, which would absorb the reflection of these new processes. For this reason, this material is a kind of attempt to integrate into the ongoing discussion about the place and development of political economy, about expanding the subject of economic theory [1; 2; 3; 4; 5; 6; 7; 8], offering an author’s methodological perspective on the principal issues of discussion. Participation in the discussion is also important from the point of view of the position of research teachers leading disciplines included in one capacity or another in economic theory. And this means - developing the criterion-value socio-economic worldview of future specialists, their methodological culture of research.

KEYWORDS

unrealized potential of methodological culture of research; methodology of political and economic research; specifics of the study of economic systems in deep transformation; globalization and global capital

Text

Text (PDF)

Read Download

1. Kleyner G. Sistemnaya ekonomika kak platforma razvitiya sovremennoy ekonomicheskoy teorii // Voprosy ekonomiki. – 2013. – № 6. S. 4–28;

2. Furubotn E.G., Rihter R. Instituty i ekonomicheskaya teoriya. Dostizheniya novoy institucional'noy ekonomicheskoy teorii. SPb.: Izdat. dom Sankt-Peterb. gos. un-ta, 2005. – 701 s.

3. Cagolov G.N. Politekonomiya buduschego // Voprosy politicheskoy ekonomii. 2015. №2. S. 39–51.

4. Bodrunov S.D. Noonomika / Monografiya / M.: Kul'turnaya revolyuciya, 2018. – 432 s.

5. Buzgalin A.V. Zakat neoliberalizma (K 200-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya Karla Marksa) // Voprosy politicheskoy ekonomii. 2018. №2. S. 122–144.

6. Ryazanov V.T. Sovremennaya politicheskaya ekonomiya: perspektivy neomarksistskogo sinteza / V.T. Ryazanov. – Sankt-Peterburg: Izdatel'stvo Aleteyya, 2019. – 436 s.

7. Bondarenko V.M. Postkovidnyy mir: neobhodimost' perehoda na novuyu paradigmu razvitiya /V. M. Bondarenko //MIR (Modernizaciya. Innovacii. Razvitie). – 2021. – T. 12. № 3. – S. 254–273.

8. Buzgalin A.V., Glaz'ev S.Yu. Rossiyskoe obrazovanie v oblasti ekonomicheskoy teorii: neobhodimoe obnovlenie // Rossiyskiy ekonomicheskiy zhurnal. 2022. №5. S. 4–21.

9. Karaseva L.A. K diskussii o transformacii hozyaystvennyh sistem i proektirovanii iz buduschego / L.A. Karaseva // Ekonomicheskoe vozrozhdenie Rossii. – 2022. – № 1(71). – S. 75-83. – DOIhttps://doi.org/10.37930/1990-9780-2022-1-71-75-83. – EDN EGMZLN.

10. Komolov O.O. Deglobalizaciya: novye tendencii i vyzovy mirovoy ekonomike // Vestnik Rossiyskogo ekonomicheskogo universiteta imeni G.V. Plehanova. 2021. T. 18, № 2. S.34–47.

11. Tyurina O.A. DEGLOBALIZACIYa: MIF ILI REAL'NOST'? // Vestnik Altayskoy akademii ekonomiki i prava. – 2023. – № 10-2. – S. 262–266; URL: https://vaael.ru/ru/article/view?id=3021 (Data obrascheniya: 06.07.2024).

12. Sergeev A.A. Struktura proizvodstvennyh otnosheniy socializma / A.A. Sergeev. – M.: Nauka, 1979. 240 s.

13. Karaseva L.A. Metodologicheskiy i politekonomicheskiy potencial sovremennoy ekonomicheskoy nauki / L.A. Karaseva // Gosudarstvennoe i municipal'noe upravlenie. Uchenye zapiski SKAGS. – 2014. – № 3. – S. 74-79. – EDN STYOWR.

14. Karaseva L.A. Netradicionnyy vzglyad na metodologicheskiy i analiticheskiy potencial klassicheskoy politicheskoy ekonomii. Chast' II. Metodologicheskiy i analiticheskiy potencial novoy politicheskoy ekonomii dlya razvitiya i sovremennogo ispol'zovaniya v usloviyah sistemnogo krizisa obschestvennoy zhizni / L.A. Karaseva // Vestnik Tverskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Ekonomika i upravlenie. – 2020. – № 2(50). – S. 241–253. – EDN FIIEEB.

15. Buzgalin Aleksandr Vladimirovich, Kolganov Andrey Ivanovich Global'nyy kapital. V 2-h tt. T. 2 Teoriya. Global'naya gegemoniya kapitala i ee predely («Kapital» re-loaded). Izdanie 3-e, ispr. i susch. dop. M.: LENAND, 2015. 904 s.

16. Karaseva L.A. Mehanizm tormozheniya v ekonomicheskoy teorii / L.A. Karaseva // Voprosy politicheskoy ekonomii. – 2022. – № 4. – S. 89–100. – DOIhttps://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7521908. – EDN PFSMRK.

17. Chumakov A.N. Globalizaciya ili deglobalizaciya? / A.N. Chumakov // Vek globalizacii. – 2023. – № 3(47). – S. 19–34. – DOIhttps://doi.org/10.30884/vglob/2023.03.02. – EDN UJAYDK.

18. Porohovskiy A.A. Civilizacionnoe znachenie politicheskoy ekonomii (stat'ya, posvyaschennaya 210-letiyu kafedry politicheskoy ekonomii ekonomicheskogo fakul'teta MGU i podgotovlennaya k Mezhdunarodnoy nauchnoy konferencii «Ekonomicheskaya sistema sovremennoy Rossii») / A.A. Porohovskiy //Rossiyskiy ekonomicheskiy zhurnal. – 2015. – № 3. – S. 76–85. – EDN UBQYVR.

19. Karaseva L.A. Otzyv na avtoreferat dissertacii Gudkovoy T.V. na temu: «Transformaciya firmy v usloviyah cifrovoy ekonomiki», predstavlennoy na soiskanie uchenoy stepeni doktora ekonomicheskih nauk po special'nosti 5.2.1 – ekonomicheskaya teoriya» URL: https://dissovet.msu.ru/download/c484e86c-9919-11ee-8d3f-005056b96f20 (Data obrascheniya: 30.07.2024).

20. Karaseva L.A. Institucionalizaciya ekonomicheskih interesov v social'no-ekonomicheskom proektirovanii razvitiya territoriy / L.A. Karaseva, A.M. Zinatulin, M.R. Topalyan // Problemy razvitiya territorii. – 2018. – № 1(93). – S. 42–56. – EDN YNUKIK.

21. Karaseva, L. A. Institucial'nye illyuzii i deystvitel'nye problemy hozyaystvennogo mehanizma rossiyskoy ekonomiki / L. A. Karaseva // Vestnik Tverskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Ekonomika i upravlenie. – 2017. – № 1. – S. 24–31. – EDN YGSJBL.

22. Dzarasov S.S., Men'shikov S.M., Popov G.H. Sud'ba politicheskoy ekonomii i ee sovetskogo klassika. M: Al'pina Biznes Buks, 2004. 454 s

23. Voeykov M.I. Sud'ba otechestvennoy politicheskoy ekonomii / M.I. Voeykov // Ekonomicheskaya nauka sovremennoy Rossii. – 2005. – № 2(29). – S. 166–173. – EDN IEZYRL.

24. Fedorov V.P. Obschaya teoriya stimulov: monografiya. M.: KNORUS, 2021. 218 s.

This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International

PDF JATS XML

Executive editor

Maksim Markin

markinmi@ystu.ru

Chief Editor

Valery Gordeev

vagordeev@rambler.ru

Deputy Editor-in-Chief

Marina Mayorova

mayorovama@ystu.ru

Deputy editor-in-chief

Galina Rodina

galinarodina@mail.ru

4750

downloads

This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Creative Commons

GOST

Karaseva L. A. Do modern theories of economics need a methodological culture of political and economic research? // Theoretical economics. 2024. no. 8. pp. 12-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52957/2221-3260-2024-8-12-24. (Date of access 06.10.2026).

MLA

Lyudmila Karaseva. "Do modern theories of economics need a methodological culture of political and economic research?." Theoretical economics.8 (2024): 12-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52957/2221-3260-2024-8-12-24.

APA

Karaseva L. A. (2024). Do modern theories of economics need a methodological culture of political and economic research?. Theoretical economics(8), 12-24. https://doi.org/10.52957/2221-3260-2024-8-12-24

Chicago

Lyudmila Karaseva. "Do modern theories of economics need a methodological culture of political and economic research?." Theoretical economics, no. 8 (2024): 12-24. https://doi.org/10.52957/2221-3260-2024-8-12-24.

WIKI

{{cite journal | author = Karaseva L. A. | title = Do modern theories of economics need a methodological culture of political and economic research? | journal = Theoretical economics | year = 2024 | issue = 8 | pages = 12-24 | doi = 10.52957/2221-3260-2024-8-12-24 }}

Copy

Export: BibTeX EndNote RefMan RusMARC

DO MODERN THEORIES OF ECONOMICS NEED A METHODOLOGICAL CULTURE OF POLITICAL AND ECONOMIC RESEARCH? Do modern theories of economics need a methodological culture of political and economic research?

Confirmation