1. Krugman P. How Did Economists Get it so Wrong? URL: https://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/06/magazine/06Economic-t.html?smid=url-share (data obrascheniya: 20.02.2023).
2. Romer P. The Trouble with Macroeconomics. URL: https://paulromer.net/the-trouble-with-macro/WP-Trouble.pdf (data obrascheniya: 20.02.2023).
3. Piketty T. Capital in the Twenty-First Century. – Moscow: Ad Marginem Press, 2015 – 592 s.
4. Kirdina S. G. Rol' institutov i geografii v ekonomicheskom razvitii: aktual'naya polemika v geterodoksal'noy ekonomike // Prostranstvennaya ekonomika. – 2016. – № 3. –S. 133-150.
5. Bazhenov G. A., Mal'cev A. A. Sovremennye geterodoksal'nye napravleniya ekonomicheskoy teorii v kontekste transformacii meynstrima // Obschestvo i ekonomika. – 2018. – Vyp. 1. – S. 5-21.
6. Kirdina-Chendler S. G. «Institucional'nyy sintez» v ekonomicheskoy teorii: proshloe, nastoyaschee ili buduschee? // Institucional'naya transformaciya ekonomiki: chelovek i socium (ITE-ChS 2021): materialy VII Mezhdunarodnoy nauchnoy konferencii, Tomsk, 21-23 oktyabrya 2021 g. Tomsk. – 2021. – S. 81
7. Kirdina-Chendler S. G. Mezoekonomika i ekonomika slozhnosti: aktual'nyy vyhod za predely ortodoksii // Journal of Institutional Studies. – 2018. – T.10. – № 3. – S. 6-17.
8. Kul'kov V. M. Geterodoksal'naya teoriya: rol' v issledovanii ekonomiki // Filosofiya hozyaystva. – 2021. – № 5. –S. 59-68.
9. Mal'cev A. A. Geterodoksal'naya ekonomicheskaya teoriya: tekuschee sostoyanie i puti dal'neyshego razvitiya // Ekonomicheskaya politika. – 2018. – T. 13. – №. 2. – S. 148-169.
10. Mal'cev A. A. Sovremennaya ekonomicheskaya nauka: na puti ot ortodoksii k plyuralizmu // XI Mezhdunarodnaya konferenciya «Rossiyskie regiony v fokuse peremen». Ekaterinburg, 17-19 noyabrya 2016 g.: sbornik dokladov. – Ekaterinburg: Izdatel'stvo UMC UPI, 2016. – Ch. 2. – S. 1147-1154.
11. Barashkova O. V., Buzgalin A. V., Pavlov M. Yu., Filatov I. V. A. I. Moskovskiy: ob institucionalizme // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 6. Ekonomika. – 2022. – №6. – S.251-271. – DOIhttps://doi.org/10.38050/013001052022611.
12. Sindzingre A. N. Prichinnost', modelirovanie i social'nye normy: ih mesto v teoreticheskom yadre geterodoksnoy ekonomiki // Zhurnal institucional'nyh issledovaniy. – 2018. – T. 10. – № 4. – S. 20-37. – DOIhttps://doi.org/10.17835/2076-6297.2018.10.4.020-037.
13. Colander D. Moving Beyond the Rhetoric of Pluralism: Suggestions for an «Inside-the-Mainstream» Heterodoxy // Economic Pluralism / R. Garnett, E. K. Olsen, M. Starr (eds.). – London, New York: Routledge, 2009. – pp. 36–47.
14. Davis J. B. Heterodox Economics, the Fragmentation of the Mainstream, and Embedded Individual Analysis // Future Directions for Heterodox Economics. – Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2008. – pp. 53–72.
15. Dzarasov R. Post Keynesian Investment and Pricing Theory: Contributions of Alfred S. Eichner and Frederic S. Lee // Advancing the Frontiers of Heterodox Economics: Essays in Honor of Frederic S. Lee / T.-H. Jo, Z. Todorova (eds.). – London, New York: Routledge, 2015. – pp. 135-153
16. Rutherford M. Institutional Economics: Then and Now // Journal of Economic Perspectives. – 2001. – Vol. 15. – No 1. – P. 173–194.
17. Thornton T. B. From Economics to Political Economy: The Problems, Promises and Solutions of Pluralist Economics. – London, New York: Routledge, 2016. – 240 r.
18. Rozmainskiy I. V. Vvedenie v postkeynsianstvo // Idei i idealy. – 2010. – № 1. – S. 88-105.
19. Akademicheskie bar'ery: problema izolyacii akademicheskih soobschestv v Rossii. URL: https://www.hse.ru/data/2015/06/24/1083743591/AF_15.pdf (data obrascheniya: 20.02.2023).
20. Yadgarov Ya. S. Preodolenie ortodoksii v ekonomicheskoy nauke XX stoletiya v kontekste novovvedeniy institucionalizma i neoklassicizma // Istoriko-ekonomicheskie issledovaniya. – 2014. – T. 15. – № 3. – S. 439–463.