Preferred tools for assessing the economic sustainability of industrial enterprises

Arkady Lifshits

PREFERRED TOOLS FOR ASSESSING THE ECONOMIC SUSTAINABILITY OF INDUSTRIAL ENTERPRISES Preferred tools for assessing the economic sustainability of industrial enterprises

АА Аа

Published in Theoretical economics · Issue 9 · Pages 54–69 · Rubric: NEW INDUSTRIALIZATION: THEORETICAL AND ECONOMIC ASPECT

Received: 11.08.2023 Accepted: 17.08.2023 Published: 02.05.2024

Authors

Arkady Lifshits

Academic degree: doctor of economic sciences

Science rang: docent

Ivanovo State University Professor · department of management · Russian Federation · Ivanovo

ABSTRACT

The economic sustainability of an industrial enterprise is a prerequisite and a chance for sustainable development. Despite the fact that the problem of economic sustainability of industrial enterprises is given considerable attention in domestic and foreign scientific literature, a number of its aspects should be recognized as insufficiently studied. These include the issues of criteria and indicators of the economic sustainability of an industrial enterprise, taking into account industry specifics, the formation of a systemic toolkit for assessing the ability of an enterprise to survive and develop. The purpose of the article is to reflect the results of a comparative analysis of domestic and foreign diagnostic tools of strategic management for the formation of the preferred tools for recognizing the economic sustainability of an industrial enterprise. When performing the study, systemic, situational and resource-targeted approaches were used. Adequate to the purpose and topic of the article, research methods are the dialectical method, the method of scientific abstraction, the method of induction and deduction, the method of analysis and synthesis, the monographic method (comparative analysis of methodological and theoretical provisions. The necessity and possibility of including a number of methods of strategic analysis and forecasting in an unchanged or modified form as a complex of non-independent research methods in the methodology for diagnosing the economic sustainability of an industrial enterprise are revealed. The special role of assessing and forecasting the economic potential in the framework of diagnosing the economic sustainability of an industrial enterprise is proved. A theoretical approach to determining the weights of the integral diagnostic indicator of relevant parameters of the situation in the branche of industry as a whole and at an individual enterprise has been formed. The assessment of the economic sustainability of industrial enterprises at the present stage of economic thought suggests its synthetic nature. Quantitative-qualitative static-dynamic assessment in the absence of the use of duplicating tools is most adequate to the modern conditions of industrial enterprises.

KEYWORDS

sustainable development, economic sustainability, integral diagnostic indicator of the economic sustainability of an industrial enterprise, diagnostic tools for the economic sustainability of an industrial enterprise, life cycle of an enterprise, economic potential of the enterprise.

Text

Text (PDF)

Read Download

1. Pechchei A. Chelovecheskie kachestva /Aurelio Pechchei; per. s angl. 2-e izd. M.: Progress, 1985. 313 c.

2. Pestel' E. Za predelami rosta /Eduard Pestel'; per. s angl. M.: Progress, 1988. 266 c.

3. Elkington J. Cannibals with forks: the triple bottom line of 21st century business /J. Elkington. . Oxford: Capstone, 1997. 402 p.

4. Hamel G. Competing for the future / Gary Hamel, C. K. Prahalad. Boston: Harvard Business Review, 1994. 327 p.

5. Adizes I. Upravlenie zhiznennym ciklom korporacii / Ichak Kalderon Adizes; per. s angl. 4-e izd. M.: Mann, Ivanov i Ferber, 2017. 512 c.

6. Baranenko C.P. Strategicheskaya ustoychivost' predpriyatiya / C.P. Baranenko, V.V. Shemetov. M.: ZAO Centrpoligraf, 2004. 493 s.

7. Kochetkov E. P. Transformaciya antikrizisnogo upravleniya v usloviyah cifrovoy ekonomiki: obespechenie finansovo-ekonomicheskoy ustoychivosti vysokotehnologichnogo biznesa /E. P. Kochetkov. M.: Prospekt, 2020. 328 c.

8. Bobryshev A. D. Monitoring ustoychivosti predpriyatiy s dlitel'nym proizvodstvennym ciklom: monografiya / A. D. Bobryshev, V. M. Tumin, M. G. Vitushkina. M.: INFRA-M, 2021. 201 c.

9. Vorob'ev A. A. Formirovanie konceptual'noy modeli ustoychivogo razvitiya organizacii: strategii i perspektivy razvitiya // Strategicheskie resheniya i risk-menedzhment. 2022. T. 13. № 3. S. 226 – 233.

10. Gorshenina E. V., Homyachenkova N. A. Monitoring ustoychivogo razvitiya promyshlennogo predpriyatiya // Rossiyskoe predprinimatel'stvo. 2011. № 1. S. 66 – 67.

11. Porter M. Konkurentnoe preimuschestvo: Kak dostich' vysokogo rezul'tata i obespechit' ego ustoychivost' / Maykl Porter; per. s angl. 5-e izd. M.: Al'pina Pablisher, 2017. 716 c.

12. Keller S. Bol'she, chem effektivnost': Kak samye uspeshnye kompanii sohranyayut liderstvo na rynke / Skott Keller, Kolin Prays; per. s angl. M.: Al'pina Pablisher, 2018. 409 c.

13. Sherman L. Poka psy layut, koty pobezhdayut: Menedzhment bez dogm / Leonard Sherman; per. s angl. M.: Al'pina Pablisher, 2020. 400 s.

14. Dettmer U. Teoriya ogranicheniy Goldratta. Sistemnyy podhod k nepreryvnomu sovershenstvovaniyu / Uil'yam Dettmer; per. s angl. 2-e izd. M.: Al'pina Biznes Buks, 2008. 444 c.

15. Shragenhaym E. Teoriya ogranicheniy v deystvii: Sistemnyy podhod k povysheniyu effektivnosti kompanii / Eli Shragenhaym; per. s angl. 2-e izd. M.: Al'pina Pablisher, 2016. 286 c.

16. Arnol'd V.I. Teoriya katastrof. 3-e izd., dop. M.: Nauka, 1990. 128 c.

17. Shul'gina Yu. V. Celevoy i resursnyy podhod v upravlenii organizaciey. – Rezhim dostupa: https: //spravochnick.ru/menedzhment/celevoy_resursnyy_podhod_v_upravlenii_organi- zaciey/ (data obrascheniya 05.04.2023)

18. Volkova I. A. Vybor strategii tehnologicheskogo razvitiya organizacii: metodologiya resursno-celevogo podhoda // Diskussiya. 2012. № 7. C. 30 – 35.

19. Busov V. I. Stoimostnaya i resursno-celevaya ocenka effektivnosti deyatel'nosti sovremennyh kompaniy // Ekonomika: problemy, resheniya i perspektivy. 2018. № 11. S. 103 – 109.

20. Lifshic A. S. Razvitie firmy: resursno-celevoy podhod /A. S. Lifshic. Ivanovo: OOO «Izdatel'stvo «Ivanovo», 2006. 112 c.

21. Instrumenty i metody antikrizisnogo upravleniya: uchebnik / pod red. A. N. Ryahovskoy, L. V. Volkova. M.: Magistr, 2021. 624 c.

22. Saati Tomas L. Prinyatie resheniy pri zavisimostyah i obratnyh svyazyah. Analiticheskie seti /Tomas Saati; per. s angl. Izd. 4. M.: LENAND, 2015. 360 c.

23. Lifshic A. S. Faktory i instrumentariy obespecheniya ustoychivogo razvitiya predpriyatiy mashinostroeniya /A.S Lifshic, R. S. Ibragimova. Moskva: RIOR:INFRA-M, 2023. 200 s.

24. Kulikov V.I. Regulirovanie proizvodstvennoy aktivnosti organizacii. /V. I. Kulikov. M.: Nauka, 2004. 624 c.

25. Temnova N.K. Ekonomicheskaya dinamika tekstil'nyh predpriyatiy: teoreticheskie, metodologicheskie i prikladnye aspekty: Avtoref. dis. d-ra ekon. nauk. – Ivanovo, 2009. 40 c.

26. Gibkoe razvitie predpriyatiya: Effektivnost' i byudzhetirovanie / pod red. V.N. Samochkina. 2-e izd., dop. M.: Delo, 2002. 376 c.

27. Ibragimova R.S., Golovkin D.S. Metodicheskoe obosnovanie ocenki ekonomicheskogo potenciala predpriyatiya tekstil'noy promyshlennosti // Sovremennye naukoemkie tehnologii. Regional'noe prilozhenie. 2016. № 3 (47). S. 64-74.

28. Evans V. Klyuchevye strategicheskie instrumenty. 88 instrumentov, kotorye dolzhen znat' kazhdyy menedzher / V. Evans; per. s angl. M.: BINOM, Laboratoriya znaniy, 2015. 456 c.

29. Dickinson V. Cash flow patterns as a proxy for firm life cycle // The Accounting Review. 2011. № 86. PP. 1969 – 1994.

30. Balashov A.M. Vliyanie ekonomicheskih sankciy na rossiyskiy biznes po dobyche i eksportu energonositeley / A.M. Balashov . - DOIhttps://doi.org/10.52957/22213260_2023_2_56. - Tekst : elektronnyy // Teoreticheskaya ekonomika. - 2023 - № 2. - S.56-62. - URL: http://www.theoreticaleconomy.ru (Data publikacii: 28.02.2023)