Evolution of Economic Systems in the Era of Technological Shift: From Market Fundamentalism to an Integral Platform Order
Abstract and keywords
Abstract:
The article examines the evolution of economic systems amidst the shift in technological and world economic paradigms, accelerated by digitalization and the proliferation of platform business models. The aim of the study is to substantiate the platform economy as a qualitatively new integral order that combines market mechanisms, hierarchical coordination, and algorithmic governance. The methodological basis comprises systemic, institutional, comparative, and evolutionary approaches, the theory of technological paradigms, as well as methods of theoretical modeling and comparative analysis of international regulatory practice. The empirical foundation consists of scientific publications, open statistics, documents of international organizations, and regulatory acts characterizing the development of the platform sector and modern approaches to its state regulation. It is demonstrated that digital platforms perform the functions of meta-institutions and private regulators: they establish rules of access and interaction, manage information flows, pricing, and competition, concentrating infrastructural power in the hands of data and algorithm owners. The scientific novelty lies in the development of the transaction cost reconfiguration concept. It is established that the reduction of search, quality measurement, and contract conclusion costs is accompanied by an increase in switching costs, subordination to algorithms, adaptation to unilateral rule changes, and loss of privacy. This transformation creates a stable dependence of participants on platforms and serves as a source of ecosystem rent. A comparison of European, Chinese, and American regulatory models revealed differences between strict ex-ante control, a flexible combination of ex-post and ex-ante instruments, and a case-based antitrust approach. It is concluded that a differentiated regulatory strategy is advisable for Russia, one that takes into account the development stage of platforms, supports national digital ecosystems, and simultaneously limits the abuse of market power. The practical significance of the results is associated with the formulation of a proactive development policy focused on technological sovereignty, investments in the new paradigm, and the use of platform infrastructure in the public interest.

Keywords:
technological structure, world economic structure, platform economy, digital platforms, transaction costs, ecosystem rent, advanced development, algorithmic management, network effects
References

1. Analiz e`tapov razvitiya cifrovizacii e`konomiki: e`volyuciya, vzglyady` avtorov i podxody` k izucheniyu ponyatiya // Ot ximii k texnologii shag za shagom. — 2025. — T. 126, № 2. — S. 4–14. — URL: https://chemintech.ru/ru/nauka/article/93385/view (data obrashheniya: 13.03.2026).

2. Demirov V.V. Algoritm i kapital: vzaimodejstvie na puti k stanovleniyu cifrovoj e`konomiki // Mezhdunarodny`j biznes. — 2025. — № 1(11). — S. 53–74. — DOI:https://doi.org/10.24833/2949-639X-2025-1-11-53-74.

3. Kozlova E.D. E`volyuciya i klassifikaciya cifrovy`x platform v usloviyax texnologicheskoj transformacii // π-Economy. — 2025. — T. 18, № 6. — S. 54–70. — DOI:https://doi.org/10.18721/JE.18603.

4. ME`F-2025: I Plenarnaya diskussiya «Novaya industrializaciya i umnozhenie naroda» // Moskovskij E`konomicheskij Forum. — 2025. — 1 aprelya. — URL: https://me-forum.ru/media/events/mef-2025-i-plenarnaya-diskussiya-novaya-industrial/ (data obrashheniya: 15.03.2026).

5. ME`F-2025: Sessiya №3 «Pora li nacionalizirovat` Centrobank Rossii?» // Moskovskij E`konomicheskij Forum. — 2025. — 1 aprelya. — URL: https://me-forum.ru/media/events/mef-2025-sessiya-3-pora-li-natsionalizirovat-tsent/ (data obrashheniya: 12.03.2026).

6. Pokrovskaya N.N. Pozicionirovanie i kommunikaciya v cifrovoj srede: issledovanie cifrovy`x sledov: monografiya / Pokrovskaya N. N.; Rossijskij gosudarstvenny`j pedagogicheskij universitet im. A. I. Gercena. — Sankt-Peterburg: Izdatel`stvo RGPU im. A. I. Gercena, 2025. — 126 c.

7. Popov E.V., Veretennikova A.Yu., Komarova O.V. i dr. E`konomicheskie e`kosistemy`: monografiya / pod nauch. red. d-ra e`kon. nauk, prof., chl.-kor. RAN E.V. Popova. — M.: INFRA-M, 2024. — 356 s.

8. Sergej Glaz`ev: Moskovskij e`konomicheskij forum predlozhit strategiyu operezhayushhego razvitiya rossijskoj e`konomiki! // Moskovskij E`konomicheskij Forum. — 2025. — 17 marta. — URL: https://me-forum.ru/media/news/17369/ (data obrashheniya: 12.03.2026).

9. Sokolov D. Peredoviki proizvodstva i potrebleniya. Kak platformy` podelili mirovy`e ry`nki // E`kspert. — 2026. — 19 fevralya. — URL: https://expert.ru/rating/arkhiv_r/ekonomikar/renking-100-krupneyshikh-mirovykh-platform/peredoviki-proizvodstva-i-potrebleniya/ (data obrashheniya: 12.03.2026).

10. Shary`j K.V., Tarasov P.A. Teoreticheskie aspekty` vliyaniya cifrovizacii na transformaciyu regional`noj e`konomicheskoj politiki // Menedzher. — 2025. — № 8(114). — S. 174–183. — DOI:https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17786962

11. Awan A. The autonomous enterprise and the four pillars of platform control: 2026 forecast // Cloud Native Computing Foundation. — 2026. — 23 January. — URL: https://www.cncf.io/blog/2026/01/23/the-autonomous-enterprise-and-the-four-pillars-of-platform-control-2026-forecast/ (data obrashheniya: 25.02.2026).

12. Best Selling Platforms: 2026 Market Share Analysis & Growth Strategies // Alibaba.com. — 2026. — March. — URL: https://www.alibaba.com/product-insights/best-selling-platforms-2026-market-share-analysis-growth-strategies.html (data obrashheniya: 03.03.2026).

13. Bonina C., Koskinen K., Eaton B. Digital platforms for development: Foundations and research agenda // Information Systems Journal. — 2021. — Vol. 31, No. 6. — P. 869–902. — DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12326.

14. China Clarifies «Safe Harbor» Rules for Vertical Agreements: Key Antitrust Compliance Implications // Chambers and Partners. — 2026. — 14 January. — URL: https://chambers.com/articles/china-clarifies-safe-harbor-rules-for-vertical-agreements-key-antitrust-compliance-implications (data obrashheniya: 02.03.2026).

15. China Sticking with Own Tech Rules Over EU Approach, SAMR Official Says // BRICS Competition Centre. — 2025. — 9 April. — URL: https://www.bricscompetition.org/ru/news/china-sticking-with-own-tech-rules-over-eu-approach-samr-official-says (data obrashheniya: 12.03.2026).

16. Commission publishes summary and responses to the consultation on the ongoing review of the Digital Markets Act // European Commission. — 2026. — 8 January. — URL: https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/api/documents?reference=mex/26/54&language=en (data obrashheniya: 15.03.2026).

17. Enache A., Rhodes A. Platform Disintermediation with Repeated Transactions // Management Science. — 2025. — Published online. — DOI:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2025.02150.

18. Forbes: rejting samy`x dorogix kompanij Runeta 2025 // Forbes Russia. — 2025. — 25 noyabrya. — URL: https://www.forbes.ru/biznes/531064-lidery-rejtinga-samyh-dorogih-kompanij-runeta-2025 (data obrashheniya: 12.03.2026).

19. Ioannidou M., Xiong B. Competition law and policy in digital markets: a comparative analysis of the EU and China. — Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2025. — 256 p. — URL: https://library.law.suffolk.edu/search~S5?/cK3876+.E42+2009/ck++3876+e42+2009/-53%2C1%2C1%2CE/frameset&FF=ck++3850+i6+2025&0%2C0%2C (data obrashheniya: 12.03.2026).

20. Is it Really Necessary for Chinas Antimonopoly Regulation of Its Digital Market to Learn from the EU DMA Model? // Concurrences. — 2026. — 12 January. — URL: https://awards.concurrences.com/en/awards/2026/academic-articles/is-it-really-necessary-for-china-s-antimonopoly-regulation-of-its-digital (data obrashheniya: 01.03.2026).

21. Jasper van den Boom J. Regulating Competition in the Digital Network Industry. — Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2026. — 250 p. — URL: https://www.lehmanns.de/shop/recht-steuern/80698167-9781009671699-regulating-competition-in-the-digital-network-industry (data obrashheniya: 15.03.2026).

22. Main Developments in Competition Law and Policy 2025 — China // Wolters Kluwer. — 2026. — 20 January. — URL: https://legalblogs.wolterskluwer.com/competition-blog/main-developments-in-competition-law-and-policy-2025-china/ (data obrashheniya: 12.03.2026).

23. Measuring the Digital Transformation: A Roadmap for the Future. — Paris: OECD Publishing, 2019. — 268 p. — URL: https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/measuring-the-digital-transformation_9789264311992-en.html (data obrashheniya: 12.03.2026).

24. Peng G., Zhang X., Liu Y. Ex-post vs. ex-ante regulation on platforms discriminatory pricing under different market structures: an evolutionary game study // Electronic Commerce Research. — 2026. — Vol. 26, No. 1. — P. 15–32. — DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-024-09933-3.

25. Qing L. How China and the European Union Regulate the Abuse of Market Dominance in the Platform Economy // Lund University Publications. — 2025. — URL: https://lup.lub.lu.se/student-papers/search/publication/9194723 (data obrashheniya: 12.03.2026).

26. Wright C.S. Optimizing Global Micropayments Through Bitcoins On-Chain Architecture for Enhanced Scalability and Economic Efficiency // Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies. — 2025. — 18864. — URL: https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/dissertations/18864/ (data obrashheniya: 15.03.2026).

27. 互联网平台垄断治理的研究进展与展望 // 国研网. — 2026. — 9 January. — URL: https://d.drcnet.com.cn/?docid=8116663&leafid=24303 (data obrashheniya: 15.03.2026).

28. 徐慧. 在发展中不断完善数字经济法治体系 // 上海法治报. — 2025. — 24 sentyabrya. — S. B02. — URL: http://www.shfzb.com.cn/shfzb/html/2025-09/24/content_150504_2661658.htm (data obrashheniya: 12.03.2026).


Login or Create
* Forgot password?